Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and Humanities

Pension Crisis Primer

I have been trying to understand our pension mess for years now, and I will tell you that the numbers and acronyms are at times baffling. But help is here.

Two of the nation's Federal Reserve Banks (the Cleveland and the Atlanta Federal Reserve Banks) have joined together to form a "Financial Monitoring Team to study pension funds and municipal finance with an eye toward implications for the wider economy and financial system." In other words, these two banks are seeking to shine a light on the dark and difficult to understand corners of municipal finance. Chiefly, the banks are interested in learning about Municipal Pensions.

The Cleveland Fed publishes a newsletter, "Forefront", and the latest issue contains a number of incredibly helpful articles about the state of municipal pensions.  The main article is: Public Finances: Shining Light on a Dark Corner. This is a clear and helpful article, with a glossary and helpful sidebars. It also comes with a video primer on the pension crisis that is sober, clear, and helpful.

One question the article addresses is just how big the pension shortfall actually is. According to government numbers, the shortfall is $800 billion. The government estimates are based on assumptions of an 8% rate of return, which inflates the assumptions about the present value of pensions. In all likelihood, the return will be somewhere between the 8% historic average and the painfully low return offered by persistently low interest rates.  Thus, many private economists estimate the shortfall at around $4 Trillion. Here is what the Cleveland and Atlanta Feds say:

Some economists, however, have come up with a $4 trillion shortfall. They have pointed out that for most state and local plans, promised pension benefits are protected by constitutional, statutory, or common law guarantees. (See related article, “Navigating the Legal Landscape for Public Pension Reform.”) By definition, this ought to make them riskless obligations to the pensioners. Thus, the appropriate valuation methodology should discount promised benefits using the risk-free interest rate, usually calculated as the yield on long-term U.S. Treasuries. This method, argued cogently by Jeffrey Brown and David Wilcox in “Discounting State and Local Pension Liabilities” (2009), has the virtue of being supported by both economic and legal principles. It also produces substantially higher estimates of the present value of pension liabilities. Given the currently low yields on Treasury bonds, this approach implies a present value of accrued obligations as high as $6.7 trillion, leaving an unfunded liability of $4 trillion.

In other words, the actual size of the pension shortfall is probably somewhere between $800 Billion (the size of the 2009 stimulus package) and $4 Trillion. The likely shortfall, as the Fed says in its video on the site, is in the $3-$4 Trillion range.

So what does this mean? The Cleveland and Atlanta Feds offer a few conclusions:

1. At this point, it seems unlikely that any major pension fund will run out of cash in the next few years, barring a general worsening of economic and financial condition.

2. But we are not out of the woods yet. Many funds will require significant reforms to reduce underfunding levels, with painful new contributions from employers and employees.

3. Another concern is that some states’ legal protections may be too strong to give reforms enough time and flexibility to put plans on sustainable paths. In that case, states would ultimately be on the hook for covering pension benefits out of general revenues. This scenario, by creating crisis conditions in those states, could stress economic conditions more generally.

The real problem is the combination of #2 and #3. For if state laws make it too difficult to cut or reduce pensions, the only option is "painful new contributions from employers or employees." It may be that we cut the guaranteed pensions of pensioners, making them less well off in retirement. That would hurt the workers. Or, if legal protections prevent that option, we the taxpayers will have to dig deep to pay their pensions, probably as we at the same time cut other essential services. And that will not be pretty. Either way, the state and local government crisis is shaping up to be one of the most important challenges of our generation.

For more on the pension crisis, you can revisit our other posts on the subject here.


The Hannah Arendt Center
The Hannah Arendt Center at Bard is a unique institution, offering a marriage of non-partisan politics and the humanities. It serves as an intellectual incubator for engaged thinking and public discussion of the nation's most pressing political and ethical challenges.

Comments (7) Trackbacks (1)
  1. Solutions that do not include substantial reductions in the rate of pension accrual for FUTURE service for CURRENT (yes CURRENT, NOT just NEW) workers are pointless …. as they accomplish nothing until the NEW workers the changes apply to will begin to retire in 20+ years.

    We’ll be insolvent LONG before then.

  2. I agree with the previous assertion: the legacy expense of current
    and many future public employee retirements is unsustainable. If
    the federal government wants to consider a tax resource, let them
    go after local, state and federal employees who are raking in 70%
    to 120% of their top pay in pensions. A benchmark could be set in
    reference to the average private employee pension. Also, they could
    justify the action on the basis of the “fairness” they find so important.

  3. amazing insight. Really enjoyed looking over this blog.
    Keep up the good work and to everyone keep on learning!

  4. There are many to choose from, but the best business laptops are in a league of their own. Knowing when to move up
    and pressure and when to play defensive while free farming
    is the characteristic of not only a great ADC
    but of any good laner in League of Legends. The list of jersey types are rather extensive with there being authentic NFL jerseys that are made for
    all ages and both genders, such as youth jerseys, personalized, throwback, and much more.

  5. great insight. Really enjoyed browsing this blog. Keep up the good work and to everyone keep on learning!

  6. This design is spectacular! You definitely know how to keep a reader amused.
    Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Fantastic
    job. I really enjoyed what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented
    it. Too cool!

  7. of course like your website however you have to take a
    look at the spelling on several of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling issues and I in finding it very
    bothersome to inform the reality however I’ll surely come again again.

Leave a comment